|
|
DOI: 10.46698/y7313-7055-9879-g
SUFFIXAL DERIVATION OF COMPOUND WORDS IN THE DIGOR DIALECT OF THE OSSETIAN LANGUAGE
Tsallagova, Iskra N.
Kavkaz Forum. 2020. Issue 2.
Abstract:
Certain dynamic processes inevitably occur in the word-building system of
any language, which determine the degree of productivity of various derivational
models. This fact accounts for the relevance of the study of these issues, as their
solution requires incessant monitoring of the most active and productive wordformation
models. This article analyzes the nouns and adjectives of the Digor
dialect of the Ossetian language, formed as a result of compounding and suffixal
derivation. The aim of the study is to determine composite models of nouns and
adjectives, in derivation of which suffixes are also involved, the identification of
their derivational activity and degree of productivity. The typological diversity
of composites, the versatility of these complex word-formation constructions,
necessitates the study of this word-formation phenomenon from various
points of view of both structure and semantics. In the study, the main method
is structural-semantic, which allowed us to produce an analytical description of
the complex-suffixal composite formations of the Digor dialect. The lexicographic
method is used when working with dictionaries of different types. In the course
of the analysis of Digor composites, a conclusion is drawn on the need for an
integrated approach to the consideration of word composition. The study of the
so-called peripheral methods of education, one of which is compounding and
suffixal, is also recognized as expedient. In this regard, the insufficient degree of
knowledge of this issue in Ossetian linguistics should be emphasized. The study
concludes that the difficult-suffix way of forming the Ossetian language in the
Digor dialect has quite high productivity, although it can vary depending on the
suffix used. The relations between the components of this type of formations are
always subordinate, which determines the presence of a supporting component
(motivator) and concretizing (specifying). The word-formation models of this type
involve both the nominal parts of speech (noun, adjective, numeral) and verbal
forms, which always act as a supporting component.
Keywords: Ossetian language, Digor dialect, word formation, composite, suffixal derivation
+ References1. Ivanova, T. K. Slozhnoe slovo kak element slovoobrazovatel’noj sistemy
russkogo i nemeckogo yazykov [Compound word as an element of the wordformation
system of the Russian and German languages]. Uchenye zapiski
Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [Scientific
notes of Kazan State University. Humanitarian sciences]. 2009, vol. 151, b. 6,
pp. 144–151.
2. Mineeva, Z. I. Prefiksal’no-suffiksal’naya derivaciya novyh agentivov
[Prefix-suffix derivation of new agentives]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta
im. N. I. Lobachevskogo [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University.
N. I. Lobachevsky]. 2015, no. 5‑6, pp. 338–345.
3. Abaev, V. I. Grammaticheskij ocherk osetinskogo yazyka [A grammatical
essay on the Ossetian language]. Ordzhonikidze, North Ossetian Book Publishing
House, 1959. 168 p.
4. Bagaev, N. K. Sovremennyj osetinskij yazyk. V 2‑h chastjah [Modern Ossetian
language. In two parts]. Chast’ 1. Fonetika i morfologija. Part I. Phonet-
ics and morphology. Ordzhonikidze, Sovero-Ossetian Book Publishing House,
1965. 486 p.
5. Akhvlediani, G. V. (red.) Grammatika osetinskogo yazyka. V 2‑kh t. [Grammar
of the Ossetic Language. In 2 vols]. T. I. Fonetika i morfologiya [Vol. I. Phonetics
and morphology]. Ordzhonikidze, North Ossetian State University, 1969.
227 p.
6. Isaev, M. I. Digorskij dialekt osetinskogo yazyka [Digor dialect of the Ossetian
language]. Moscow, Nauka Publishing House, 1966. 221 p.
7. Takazov, F. M. Grammaticheskij ocherk osetinskogo yazyka [A grammatical
essay on the Ossetian language]. Vladikavkaz, North Ossetian Institute for
Humanitarian and Social Studies, 2009. 164 p.
8. Digorsko-russkij slovar’ [Digor-Russian dictionary]. Comp. F. M. Takazov.
Vladikavkaz, 2003. 736 p.
9. Mineeva, Z. I. Aktivnye processy v derivacii neoagentivov v sovremennom
russkom yazyke (1960‑2016 gg.): strukturno-semanticheskij i pragmaticheskij
aspekty [Active processes in the derivation of neoagents in the modern Russian
language (1960-2016): structurally-semantic and pragmatic aspects]. The
dissertation of a doctor of philological sciences (in Philology). Petrozavodsk.
2017. 572 p.
10. Kubryakova, E. S. Slovoobrazovanie [Word formation]. Obshchee yazykoznanie
(vnutrennyaya struktura yazyka) [General linguistics (internal structure
of the language)]. Moscow, Nauka Publishing House, 1972, pp. 334–393.
11. Tsallagova, I. N. K voprosu o kompozitnom obrazovanii v sovremennom
osetinskom yazyke (na osnove yazykovogo materiala digorskogo dialekta) [On
the issue of composite derivation in the modern Ossetian language (based on
the language material of the Digor dialect)]. Izvestiya SOIGSI [Proceedings of
the North Ossetian Institute for Humanitarian and Social Studies]. 2019, iss. 32
(71), pp. 73‑80.
12. Gabaraev, N. YA. Morfologicheskaya struktura slova i slovoobrazovanie
v sovremennom osetinskom yazyke [The morphological structure of the word
and word formation in the modern Ossetian language]. Tbilisi, Metsniereba
Publishing House, 1977. 175 p.
13. Gavrilkina (Utkina), T. Yu. Derivacionnyj potencial slovoobrazovatel’nyh
tipov s nulevymi suffiksami (na materiale imen sushchestvitel’nyh) [Derivation
potential of word-formation types with zero suffixes (on the material of
nouns)]. Izvestija Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta
imeni A. I. Gercena [News of the Russian State Pedagogical University named
after A. I. Herzen]. 2008, no. 80, pp. 40–44.
14. Gavrilkina, T. Yu. Konkurenciya nulevyh i material’no vyrazhennyh suffiksov:
k probleme kommunikativnogo vybora [The competition of zero and materially
expressed suffixes: to the problem of communicative choice]. Al’manah
sovremennoj nauki i obrazovanija [Almanac of modern science and education].
2016, no. 5 (107), pp. 29‑31.
← Contents of issue
|
